|
To sum up, let us try to show when it
is profitable to use CAD/CAM and when it is not through some examples:
Cases where CAD/CAM utilization is profitable:
When a pair of earrings is to be manufactured, after making the
model of the first one, Figure 14, the bigger problem is to make
the model of the second one of the pair as a mirror image copy of
the first, Figure 15. This operation is very complicated and time
consuming when carried out by hand, even more than the production
of the base model. By means of the computer it is quite simple and
fast, Figure 16.
The time required for the production of a mirror
copy depends only on the power of the computer in which the program
has been installed.
The more power, the faster it is. The same reasoning
is applicable to the resizing of a ring or of a clasp or a pendant.
We know very well that, when we put a new set
of jewellery on the market, we cannot offer a single model, but
we should offer several variants, even if only in the different
standard size variants, that is small, medium and large. To satisfy
this simple requirement, the model maker would have to make the
same model three times, each in the different dimensions. When a
computer is used, it is sufficient to scale up or down the relevant
CAD model parameters to obtain all the required size variants offered
by CAD/CAM designing, Figure 17.
Fretwork is another example of the advantages
offered by CAD/CAM designing. The bangle discussed earlier, Figure
7, is a good example: If a model maker is required to cut by hand
a set of little hearts or flowers on a bracelet, he needs several
hours’ work, and eventually the work may not be accurate enough.
If the same operation is carried out with a computer, the time required
is much shorter and the final result is accurate to a hundredth
of a millimeter. The same holds for joints or hinges for watchcases
and wrist-watch bracelets.
Cases when CAD/CAM utilization Is not
profitable:
A fairly common error made by companies that use CAD/CAM is trying
to make their models completely with this system for all cases.
In practice, it may be preferable to produce some extremely technical
and complicated pieces that are difficult to make by hand, by means
of a milling machine or other suitable machine. Other pieces can
be committed to the skill of the goldsmith. Therefore, CAD/CAM should
not be considered as a substitute for traditional techniques, but
as a complementary technique that helps the goldsmith to carry out
some operations more rapidly and more accurately.
|